Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Coordinates
    From: Hal Mueller
    Date: 2001 Sep 25, 11:07 PM

    Peter Dana has a very nice exposition of datums, ellipsoids, and
    coordinate systems.  I just took another look at his stuff while
    thinking about this question--it's at
    http://www.colorado.edu/geography/gcraft/notes/datum/datum.html
    (the drawing of coordinate shifts for a particular point at
    http://www.colorado.edu/geography/gcraft/notes/datum/gif/shift.gif is
    worth a look also)
    
    My thoughts (I am not a real geodesist, someone please correct me):
    7 seconds difference is not a terribly gross error.  It's about 230
    yards at the equator, which is in the same ballpark as the difference
    between NAD27 and WGS84 (pre- and post-GPS coordinate systems; the
    error you get when you pick coordinates off an old chart and enter
    them into your GPS as modern coordinates).
    
    Your source says La Canoa's earth radius is 6378388 meters.  WGS84's
    earth radius is 6378137.0.  These give equatorial circumferences of
    40076594 meters (La Canoa) and 40075016 meters (WGS84), a difference
    of 1577 meters.  At 10 degrees latitude the difference would of
    course be a bit less, but I'll skip over that.
    
    Let me push a little further--those radii mean, if I understand
    correctly, that WGS84 says the distance from 0 deg N 71.5 W to 0 N 0
    W is (71.5/360)*40075016 meters, or 7959344 meters, while La Canoa
    says that distance is (71.5/360)*40076594 meters, or 7959657 meters,
    a difference of 313 meters.
    
    Longitude by WGS84 is 71.473250; by La Canoa it's 71.471256.
    WGS84 long * WGS84 circumf = 7956365.8 m
    La Canoa long * La Canoa circum = 7956456.9 m
    
    so now we only have a 91 meter discrepancy.  This is without
    accounting for the differences in latitude due to the difference in
    the assumed shape of the earth, and assuming also that the position
    of that cathedral was accurately determined in the first place.  So I
    think those two coordinate representations are at least reasonable.
    
    Hal
    
    
    ----
    Hal Mueller                hal{at}mobilegeographics.com
    Mobile Geographics LLC     http://www.mobilegeographics.com/
    Seattle, Washington        (206) 297-9575
    Get CelestNav 2.2.2!  http://www.mobilegeographics.com/celestnav/
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site