Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Consistent "away" intercepts. Why?
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2019 May 4, 15:07 -0700

    To add to my earlier post, I think what Bill was saying is that if everything was perfect, your position lines should cross at a point.  If the three azimuths had no angle greater than 180 between them, the three unknown fixed (and therefore equal) errors in ho (or the tables) would all be radii of the inscribed circle of the ensuing cocked hat (by definition of the inscribed circle).  If there was an angle greater than 180 between the azimuths, the three equal errors would now be radii of the excircle centred at the true position. See diagram.  If the true position was already be known to a high degree of accuracy, this fact might be used to analyse the fixed error. DaveP


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site