Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Computer space required to get 1" accuracy
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2010 Apr 29, 07:57 -0700

    Apr 29, 2010

    Dear Frank,

    Although I am going to be very very busy at least until late May, with almost no spare time, I have taken up a few minutes to keep working work on this topic.


    On April 13 th, From: FrankReed---com Re: [NavList 12842]
    Date: 13 Apr 2010 17:14 , you wrote :

    " I would be interested to see if you can beat my 111 bytes per day (Sun, Moon, 4 nav planets, for one arcsecond accuracy using plain linear interpolation)."


    I started with just the Moon with Ecliptic Longitude Mean Ecliptic / Equator at 24 hour intervals starting from Apr 29, 2010 at 00:00 TT.

    For such 24 hour intervals (from 29 APR 00:00.00 TT until 03 May 00:00.00 TT )I get second differences reaching 1366.7", which for mid-interval, would account for a neglected second order term 8 times smaller, i.e. @ 170".

    Since the objective is to compute position with just plain LinInt, we would need to restrict the tabular interval well below 1 hour (actually 1 hour gives about 6 " accuracy with just linear interpolation).

    So, if we keep "first guessing and reasoning" from the classical LintInt formulae, we would require the Moon Tabular values most probably 4 times/hour, i.e.almost 100 times per period of 24 hours.

    This is why I am very surprised that you can achieve all four Nav Planets + Moon + SUN in just 111 bytes per 24 hours, or at least this is my understanding of what you earlier indicated.

    You must have some QUITE CLEVER approach, which I would perfectly understand you might prefer to keep un published.

    However, I am very curious here simply because your claim here-above has made my mouth water in the sense that I see an opportunity here to learn more on a subject of interest.

    Any information on this topic which you feel free to indicate on this forum will be greatly appreciated.

    Meanwhile, Best Regards from

    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

    PS : I have found a 1" claimed accuracy representation for the Jupiter Heliocentric Coordinates ( R,L,B) which seems to be no more than 10 000 bytes ( 10 kB) in total to cover the entire 2000 year long period [1000 A.D. - 3000 A.D.]. I think this one is, and by far, an all category winner in this respect.

    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site