
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Compass Adjustment - A Cautionary tale
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 Jan 31, 22:58 -0500
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 Jan 31, 22:58 -0500
Trevor- <> No, not "down". The weight is substantial compared to the amount of force the pole puts on the needle. You could look at this as being a dual-axis device, which responds to local gravitic field AND local magnetic field, and on this planet the gravitic field is far grosser. That ball may not be "level", it can even be inverted (if you can gravitize your ceiling ) but the magnetic response is still unaffected as far as I can see. Have you ever had one hands-on? There's no "bearing" to bind, no needle to jam. I don't see any way for an off-level magnetic pull to cause a problem, except in that the pole may be 'under' rather than 'at' the place the compass is pointing. Not a problem when we're only using the compass for 2-d navigation. Possibly a problem if you're planning on taking the REALLY direct route to China. << Or do aircraft simply carry gyros? >> Forget commercial aviation, think Piper Cub and bush pilots. Plain old "general aviation" with individual pleasure operators. They pretty much all still have a magnetic compass stuck at the top center of the windshield, for the simple reason that a mag compass is the most robust and failure-proof navigation instrument they can carry. Gyros are heavy and expensive, even today. And all the fancy electronics, well, , let's just say all the newer navigation equipment has far richer options for failure modes.