Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Comparing SR methods?
    From: Michael Bradley
    Date: 2017 Mar 17, 03:56 -0700

    Hi Tony

    By happenstance I've recently been running an intermittent study of Hav/Doniol using Hanno's 4 figure haversine table.

    The comparison is against the same data used with the StarPilot app, which has a long standing reputation for reliability.

    The criterion of acceptability I've chosen is to perform the reduction within 1' of the StarPilot result for the same data.

    I don't throw any information away early in the process, so use Lat, Long and ephemeral data with a 0.1' precision, then round the data for t, Lat, Dec to the nearest minute. I interpolate the haversine on the downside for angles up to 90 degrees, on the upside above 90 degrees.

    It all works fine in 4 figures until the navigational triangle gets smaller - Lat and Dec near the nearest pole, or meridian angle small so the the triangle is obtuse. I had to use 5 figure haversines to meet my accuracy criterion for a twighlight sight of Pollux on the 15th, meridian angle 14 degrees, my Lat 55 degrees. That's the first time I've hit trouble. I guess any small fixed length numerical approach would struggle dealing with the same triangle.

    One solution is to stop the boat and wait an hour for a Mer Pass ....


    Michael Bradley

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site