Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Comments on the units
    From: Doug Royer
    Date: 2006 Apr 7, 14:03 -0700

    So the American artillerists sacrifice the ease of calculation
    to higher precision.
    "Not because of inferior quality of the compass but I am comfortable
    useing 6400 mils to a circle."
    I don't think so. I (and all others in the US military) were 1st trained on
    and then used the gear. It became 2nd nature to use what we were trained on
    and to get results quickly. With the experience gained by using the 6400 mil
    format per 360 degrees one knows without really thinking about it how many
    mils equal a degree or a quadrant of mils will equal so many degrees etc.
    Conversions of bearings from one to the other and visa-versa just become 2nd
    1 * = 17.78 mils
    90 * = 1600 mils
    The 6,000 mil format the Soviets used on their compasses was just alien to
    me for fast, reliable readings and conversions with out having to think
    about it.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site