
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Cocked hats, again.
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Mar 16, 12:57 -0700
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Mar 16, 12:57 -0700
Gary laPook wrote: On Mar 15, 6:04 pm, "P F"wrote: > Gary wrote: > > his true position may be significantly outside the cocked > > hat > > Oh come on, Gary. How would the "true position" get to be "significantly > outside"? Easy. If by chance plotting the LOPs resulted in a small triangle this doesn't mean that sigma is necessarily small. So in that case the true position will lie in the circles of probability that are larger than the triangle. So, for example, picking a number for sigma out of the air of one nautical mile, the position of the observer will be somewhere within the one mile circle (one sigma) centered on the plotted fix only 39.3% of the time and within a circle of 1.177 sigma (1.177 NM) 50% of the time. This circle is also known as CEP or circular probable error. Continuing drawing circles, 66% within 1.48 NM, 75% within 1.67 NM, 90% within 2.15 NM, 99% within 3 nm and 99.9% of the time within 3.72 NM. Put another way, one third of the time the position will be more than 1.48 NM away, 10% of the time the position will be more than 2.15 NM from the plotted fix and 1 % more than 3 NMs away. At the other end of the distribution there is only a 10% chance that the position of the observer will be within .48 NM of the fix. ( See table Q6c of Appendix Q on page 1221 of vol. 1 of Bowditch, 1977 ed.)So, what does this tell us. There is about a 30% chance that the position of the observer will be more than .48 NM but less than 1.0 NM and about a 61% chance that the position of the observer will be more than 1.0 NM from the plotted fix. If the triangle plots with LOPs only one half mile from the center then there is approximately a 1 in three chance that your position could be up to 1 NM outside the triangle, a 10 % chance that it is 1.65 NM outside and a 1% chance that it is 2.5 NM outside. Even if you don't know what the sigma numerically is it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist and that you can ignore it. By "significantly" I mean rocks in the bilge. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---