NavList:

George Huxtable wrote:

>
>It will be interesting to discover whether Gary can be convinced. Or,
>alternatively, whether he can convince us that we're wrong.
>
> 
>
Gary LaPook responded:



"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was
without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and
the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters.
"And God said 'let there be a line of position which I will call "A"'
and thus the first line of position was upon the face of the deep. And
this line of position ran straight north and south and divided the
waters of the earth into two halves with an observer having an equal
chance of being either to the east or to the west of the line of position.

"And God saw that the LOP was good and God had separated the east from
the west.

"And God said 'Let there be a second LOP which I will call 'B' and let
it run straight east and west dividing the north from the south and God
saw that this was good also and He was pleased. Then God said 'let "A"
and "B" cross dividing the earth and the waters into four quadrants so
that my observer will have a one in four probability of being in any one
of the quadrants and this was done, and God was mightily pleased" (See
diagram 2.)

This is where probability, statistics, standard deviation and 'sigma'
come into the story.

Going back to diagram 1, even though an observer has a 50-50 chance of
being on one side or the other of "A" he is limited in how far away he
can be from "A." Looking at standard deviation and gaussian distribution
we can be fairly certain that he is no more that 3.3 sigmas (standard
deviations) east or west of "A" , only one observation in a thousand
would be farther away than that. Or, to raise the certainty higher, we
know he has less than one chance in ten thousand of being more than 4
sigmas and less than one chance in a million of being more than five
sigmas away. We can illustrate all the places that the observer could be
by adding to diagram 1 two lines parallel to "A" ,one to the east and
one to the west, spaced to show the band either 3.3, 4, or 5 sigmas
wide, whichever you fancy. This is done in diagram 3.  Let's call these
additional lines "A-" and "A+." We can see that the observer will still
have a 50-50 chance of being east or west of "A" but he is constrained
to be within the boundaries determined by sigmas. He can't be anywhere
else in the universe. (If you need a real number to hold onto, figure
one sigma using a sextant on the surface is one nautical mile and  2
nautical miles if  using a bubble sextant in flight. Your milage may vary.) The observer must
be in the bands delimited by "A-" to "A" and on to "A+" which we can
call the bands of possible positions.

Now, the same reasoning holds for LOP "B" and this is shown in diagram
4. The observer has a 50-50 chance of being north or south of "B" and he
must be within the bands of possible positions delimited by "B-" and
"B+." Now, when you combine the two sets of probabilities for "A" and
for "B" you get diagram 5 which shows that the observer has a one in
four probability of being in any one of the four quadrants limited by
"A-", "A+", B-", "B+" and centered on the intersection of the the two
LOPs, "A" and "B." The observer cannot be anywhere else on earth.

Now, this is important. The only places the observer can be are all
contained within these four quadrants determined by the first two LOPs,
"A" and "B."  No matter how many more LOPs you add to the diagram the
observer can never be outside this original limit. Additional LOPs can
further reduce the possible locations to just a portion of the original
figure but can never expand it.. Read this paragraph again and make sure
you understand why this is true..

Diagram 6 shows in pink all of the possible positions of the observer
based on LOPs "A" and "B" and shows that there is a one fourth chance of
being in any one quadrant.

Now we move on to diagram 7 which shows a third LOP, "C" crossing at a
45 degree angle to the first two LOPs and intersecting at the same point. (
I drew it this way for convenience but the argument would hold true for
an equilateral triangle or any other triangle.)
 
In diagram 8 we have added "C-" and "C+" spaced from "C" in the same
manner as the first two LOPs. Diagram 9 just shows "A," "B," and "C"
darkened. Note, we still do not have a "cocked hat" to be inside of
outside of.,

Diagram 10 shows in pink all the possible positions for the observer
with the third LOP at "C" intersecting at the same point as "A" and "B." You will notice
that "C-" and "C+" have reduced the possible locations for the observer
by cutting off the northeast and the southwest corners of diagram 6.
This has improved the accuracy of the fix somewhat by eliminating some
of the possibilities. Diagram 11 shows that the northwest and southeast 
quadrants now have somewhat more than a one in four chance and the
southwest and northeast each have somewhat less than a one in four
probability.

In diagram 12 we finally get a cocked hat! The only change in this
diagram is that we have moved the third LOP away from the intersection 
of "A" and "B" by the width of the band of possible positions so it is
now located at "C+." This shifts the bands of possible positions based
upon the third LOP to the area between "C" and the newly added "C++"
which is equally spaced to the northeast from "C+." Diagram 13 more
clearly shows the cocked hat. It is made up of lines "A," " B," and "C+."

Diagram 14 shows in pink the possible locations of the observer based on
this configuration of LOPs. This illustrates that the positions must
still be within the original four quadrants. The "C" line has eliminated
the entire original southwest quadrant and sliced in half the northwest
and southeast quadrants. The remaining pink triangle is only half as
large as figure 6, meaning that we have improved the accuracy of our fix
by a factor of two by eliminating half of the area covered by the two
LOP fix. This also shows that a large portion of the possible locations
of the observer are outside the cocked hat and that there are two small
corners inside the cocked hat where the observer cannot be. However, a large
proportion of the possible locations are within the cocked hat and the
outside positions are not three to one compared to the positions inside.

Moving along, we repeat the process by moving the third LOP further to
the northeast by one more band of possible positions so that it now is
at "C++." This makes the cocked hat larger and is illustrated in diagram
15. Diagram 16 now illustrates in pink all of the possible locations of
the observer with this configuration. You will see that as the cocked
hat has gotten larger the possible locations for the observer has gotten
much smaller and all of these positions are in the northeast corner of
the northeast quadrant and ALL  are contained within the cocked hat! 
There is no way the observer can be located outside the cocked hat. So,
clearly, no three to one  ratio of positions outside the cocked hat to
those inside.  In fact it is a one hundred percent to zero percent ratio
of inside to outside.

Diagram 17 is slightly different. This time, instead of moving the third
LOP one more complete band of possible positions, we move it only so
that it is now one band away from the northeast corner of the northeast
quadrant, the point defined by "A+" and "B+." The third LOP in now at
"Z." The southwest limit of the band of possible positions related to
the "Z" LOP is line "Y" which passes over the intersection of "A+" and
"B+." Since the diagrams are now getting pretty complicated I have
copied the pertinent lines on to diagram 18. This diagram shows that the
only possible location for the observer is at the intersection of "A+",
"B+" and "Y." This point is the only place that all three bands of
possible locations touch and is the northeast corner of the northeast
quadrant. This one point is exactly in the center of the cocked hat and
is equidistant from lines "A" , "B" and "Z." This is the only point on
the planet where the observer can be with the maximum sized cocked hat.
Obviously, again, no three to one ratio of outside to inside positions.
In fact it is still a one hundred percent to zero percent ratio of
inside to outside.

So, have I convinced you?

(Attached are two files containing 18 diagrams. I broke them into two groups so that the files would be smaller. Diagrams 6,10,11,14,16,and 18 are in color and are in the second file.)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---