Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Classification of the methods for clearing the Lunar Distances
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2003 Apr 9, 12:40 +0100

    Herbert Prinz said, of Bowditch-
    
    
    "I came to realize that it was the general trend of this publication after
    the death of Bowditch to let new technology mature for a quarter of a
    century before taking it into consideration. (First brief mentioning of
    Sumner line in 1855, intercept method around WWI)"
    
    It's not the only publication to behave in that way.
    
    I have recently acquired a copy of "Navigation and Nautical Astronomy", by
    J R Young ("formerly professor of mathematics in Belfast College"). This
    copy was published as one of "Weale's Scientific and Technical series",
    "New Edition 1903". This was the Young behind Young's method for clearing
    the lunar distance, referred to in Cotter.
    
    In itself, Young's is quite a useful little book, with quite a lot of
    pertinent information about lunars. This was rather a pleasant surprise, as
    by 1903 the lunar distance method must have been quite dead: indeed, within
    a couple of years, lunar distances would be omitted from the Nautical
    Almanac.
    
    That wasn't the only surprise. The book contains a number of examples of
    navigational calculations, backed by relevant extracts from a Nautical
    Almanac. The surprise was in the date for these examples and extracts,
    which was 1858, 45 years earlier. It became clear that the 1903 "new
    edition" was based on an earlier edition of the 1850s, in which the
    examples had not been updated.
    
    Delving into the contents provided further surprises. There was no mention
    of position lines, or Sumner, or St Hilaire's "New Navigation", which dates
    from 1875. Finding a ship's position was described entirely in terms of
    obtaining the latitude and then, separately, the longitude: the techniques
    of a generation of navigators, long before that "new edition" of 1903. It
    appears that little or nothing had been updated for that "new edition".
    
    It seems to me something of a scandal that such a text should have been
    peddled at that date, presumably to aspiring navigators who wished to learn
    their craft from it. It's relevance in 1903 was largely historical. No
    wonder the poor fellows got confused.
    
    George Huxtable.
    
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site