Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Classification of the methods for clearing the LunarDistances
    From: Herbert Prinz
    Date: 2003 Apr 11, 03:21 +0000

    Hello George,
    
    A so called "New edition" appeared already in 1874 in London at Lockwood & co.
    ( x, 282 p. 1 illus.,  diagrs.). Chances are, you have a reprint of this. If
    there were truly another new edition in 1903, it should give the name of the
    editor, as  John Radford Young died in 1885.
    
    Cotter refers to a book from 1856 titled "Practical Astronomy, Navigation and
    Nautical Astronomy". I cannot locate it in any catalog. This might be the first
    edition or the base of the above. If so, the publishers did not try to cheat:
    Instead of updating the contents, they changed the title, indicating that the
    text was not practical anymore.
    
    Best regards
    
    Herbert Prinz
    
    
    
    George Huxtable wrote:
    
    >
    > I have recently acquired a copy of "Navigation and Nautical Astronomy", by
    > J R Young ("formerly professor of mathematics in Belfast College"). This
    > copy was published as one of "Weale's Scientific and Technical series",
    > "New Edition 1903".
    
    [...]
    
    >
    >  The surprise was in the date for these examples and extracts,
    > which was 1858, 45 years earlier. It became clear that the 1903 "new
    > edition" was based on an earlier edition of the 1850s, in which the
    > examples had not been updated.
    >
    > Delving into the contents provided further surprises. There was no mention
    > of position lines, or Sumner, or St Hilaire's "New Navigation", which dates
    > from 1875. Finding a ship's position was described entirely in terms of
    > obtaining the latitude and then, separately, the longitude: the techniques
    > of a generation of navigators, long before that "new edition" of 1903. It
    > appears that little or nothing had been updated for that "new edition".
    >
    > It seems to me something of a scandal that such a text should have been
    > peddled at that date, presumably to aspiring navigators who wished to learn
    > their craft from it. It's relevance in 1903 was largely historical. No
    > wonder the poor fellows got confused.
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site