NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Classification of the methods for clearing the Lunar Distances
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2003 Apr 11, 22:36 +0200
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2003 Apr 11, 22:36 +0200
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Stark"To: Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:17 PM Subject: Re: Classification of the methods for clearing the Lunar Distances > Never you mind what that writer in your 1962 Bowditch said about haversines. > Haversines were used by navigators before that fellow's grandfather was born. > It's just that the weren't called "haversines." They were called things like > "logarithms of the horary angle," "log sine square . . .," etc. They saved > two steps in working a time sight. Not every set of navigation tables had > them. > Yes, it is true. The late date of introducing haversines into the nautical astronomy in the 1962 Bowditch is valid in some extent only in the relation to Marcq St. Hilaire method, the "new navigation" of the end of the 19th century. It broke through only from 1890 or so, at first in navies. And at the beginning various formulas circulated for reducing its "intercepts". Thereafter the standard cosine-haversine formula won out from cca 1905 and from 1910 the "short" methods started to be used. In 1905 Percy L.H.Davis published his "Requisite Tables", where the log-haversines and nat-haversines were printed in two adjacent colums of one table for the (nearly) first time, so that one could get across from logs to natural values and vice versa without finding out the auxiliary angle ("theta" in the cosine-haversine formula) itself. This helped the haversine formula to the popularity very much. Rose added the third column with the log cosine only after 1950. For computing the local hour angles of celestial body from old "time sights" (to obtain longitude by comparing H.A. of a body with the chronometer or "lunar" GMT) the versines or haversines were used at sea from 1767 (Maskelyne) at least. Their another name (in addition to the pseudonyms cited by Bruce) was often "log risings". But combined tables of their natural and logarithmic values were not published until 1905 - with the great exception of Douwes' tables from 1775, printed in Amsterdam. These tables offered the natural and logarithmic values of versine in two adjacent columns in the exactly same arrangement, as proposed by Davis in 1905! Unfortunatelly, the language barrier blocked this superb concept from being introduced into the use of Anglo-Saxon and French navigators for 140 years. Jan Kalivoda