Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Circle charts
    From: Richard M Pisko
    Date: 2009 Jan 30, 23:52 -0700

    On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:34:27 -0700,  wrote:
    > It occurred to me that there is intermediate variant between printing
    > circle of position on a chart and constructing them manually every time
    > it is needed. What can be done instead, is for certain pair of bases
    > every point of its middle perpendicular can be graduated with the angles
    > (in degrees) at which this pair of bases is visible from any point of
    > the circle with the center on this point and radius equal to the
    > distance between this point and one of the bases.
    I like that idea for my intended trials down at the river bottoms, with a
    number of unknown locations smaller than that required for dredging.  I
    even have a beam compass that will let me work to a larger scale than the
    available topographic quadrangles, by plotting on a large sheet of butcher
    paper with an A2 sheet in my expected location.  It seems to me that I
    could plot intersecting circles fairly quickly that way; just on that
    particular A2 sheet.
    In my opinion, the advantage of using your lines directly is being able to
    pick out the observed angles quite accurately.  The advantage of
    pre-plotting circles to a larger scale onto an A2 sheet is being able to
    locate your (reasonably close) position more quickly; and without needing
    a large plotting table.
    > Attached PDF shows what I mean by that. Hopefully.
    Is your formula for the circle centers on the perpendicular bisectors
    something like: <(distance between station points)/(2 x tan of the
    observation angle)>?  Which drawing program did you use?
    Looks good at first study; but I think it is preferable to have the middle
    shore station closest to your expected position to avoid the indeterminate
    case of the circle of position.  The scales should then be diverging.
    We could continue the lines in the other direction for observation angles
    of greater than 90 degrees, I would think; even though that case may not
    be as common.  My preference would be to choose shore stations giving
    angles not too much closer than 20 degrees; even better around 60, so as
    to get good intersections of position circles.  Of course, it is not
    necessary to use a common point, four shore stations could be used as two
    pairs instead, but there would still be a minimum of two intersecting
    Thank you.
    Richard . . .
    Using Opera 9.2.4 after the "Dog" died
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site