Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Chihae, Korea Lunar
    From: Mike Burkes
    Date: 2008 Nov 14, 17:01 -0800

    Hi again Jeremy, I graphed your shots and they were quite scattered
    but I did notice 3,4, and 5 were nearly st. line. My average yielded
    GMT 08-04-48 and Lunar GMT yielded 08-03-03 a 1m 45 sec difference and
    00.8' error. I suspect the proper method would involve determining the
    slope Ds over GMT and moving that line amidst the scatter to determine
    line of best fit. I will try that next and thanks for input!
    Mike Burkes
    
    On Nov 13, 1:37�am, Anabasi...@aol.com wrote:
    > Hello all,
    >
    > Fortune has not been kind to me this trip in the navigation �department. �The
    > ship is stuck in Chinhae, ROK at the moment and so I won't �likely be getting
    > any Celestial navigation in anytime soon. �The haze and �often cloudy weather
    > this time of year will hamper even my lunar efforts. � Fortunately, we face
    > south, so there was a nice opportunity to shoot a set of �lunars the other day.
    > �Here is the data for those who want to play with the �number.
    >
    > �As a side bar, without everyday Internet access, I am relying on �Arthur
    > Pearson's spreadsheet to run the calculations. �I have Bruce �Starke's tables
    > with me, but I have been too busy to dedicate the time required �to reduce with
    > them.
    >
    > Chinhae Lunar
    >
    > Sun to Moon (near limb obviously)
    >
    > Position: Lat 35 deg 6.4' North
    > � � � � �Long 128 deg 41.3' �East
    >
    > Date: 5 November 2008 (ZD -9)
    > Index error 0.7' on the arc
    >
    > Ds � � � � � � � � Local Time of sight
    >
    > 80 deg 05.6 � �1701-41
    > 80 deg 06.9 � �1702-39
    > 80 deg 06.8 � �1704-09
    > 80 deg 06.0 � �1704-51
    > 80 deg 05.2 � �1705-25
    >
    > I'm afraid it's not a very good "grouping" but given the low altitude of �the
    > sun and haze, it was hard to get the shades correct for a good arc and there �
    > might have been some non-standard refraction as well. �My straight �averaging
    > of Ds and time gave me a GMT of 08h 4m 55s with an error of 1min 11 �seconds
    > fast (0.5' error in observation). �I hope other reduction methods �are at
    > least close.
    >
    > Jeremy
    > **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news &
    > more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?red...
    > p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site