
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Chihae, Korea Lunar
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2008 Nov 14, 17:01 -0800
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2008 Nov 14, 17:01 -0800
Hi again Jeremy, I graphed your shots and they were quite scattered but I did notice 3,4, and 5 were nearly st. line. My average yielded GMT 08-04-48 and Lunar GMT yielded 08-03-03 a 1m 45 sec difference and 00.8' error. I suspect the proper method would involve determining the slope Ds over GMT and moving that line amidst the scatter to determine line of best fit. I will try that next and thanks for input! Mike Burkes On Nov 13, 1:37�am, Anabasi...@aol.com wrote: > Hello all, > > Fortune has not been kind to me this trip in the navigation �department. �The > ship is stuck in Chinhae, ROK at the moment and so I won't �likely be getting > any Celestial navigation in anytime soon. �The haze and �often cloudy weather > this time of year will hamper even my lunar efforts. � Fortunately, we face > south, so there was a nice opportunity to shoot a set of �lunars the other day. > �Here is the data for those who want to play with the �number. > > �As a side bar, without everyday Internet access, I am relying on �Arthur > Pearson's spreadsheet to run the calculations. �I have Bruce �Starke's tables > with me, but I have been too busy to dedicate the time required �to reduce with > them. > > Chinhae Lunar > > Sun to Moon (near limb obviously) > > Position: Lat 35 deg 6.4' North > � � � � �Long 128 deg 41.3' �East > > Date: 5 November 2008 (ZD -9) > Index error 0.7' on the arc > > Ds � � � � � � � � Local Time of sight > > 80 deg 05.6 � �1701-41 > 80 deg 06.9 � �1702-39 > 80 deg 06.8 � �1704-09 > 80 deg 06.0 � �1704-51 > 80 deg 05.2 � �1705-25 > > I'm afraid it's not a very good "grouping" but given the low altitude of �the > sun and haze, it was hard to get the shades correct for a good arc and there � > might have been some non-standard refraction as well. �My straight �averaging > of Ds and time gave me a GMT of 08h 4m 55s with an error of 1min 11 �seconds > fast (0.5' error in observation). �I hope other reduction methods �are at > least close. > > Jeremy > **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & > more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?red... > p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---