NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Chauvenet
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2004 Sep 11, 19:46 -0700
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2004 Sep 11, 19:46 -0700
I have 3 different editions of Chauvenet's "A Manual of Spherical and Practical Astronomy". Let me summarize: My old 5th edition is dated 1863 in the preface, contains a note from 1868, and a title page date of 1903, printed by Lippincott. It calls itself the fifth revised and corrected edition. It is in two volumes. Volume 1 is the navigation material that is of great interest to this group; it is subtitled "Spherical Astronomy". Volume 2 is the astronomy material that George Huxtable referred to as not being as useful for navigators, to which I concur except for a short chapter on sextants. It is subtitled "Theory and Use of Astronomical Instruments". The Dover reprint of 1960 was done in two identical volumes to the original. It is "an unabridged and unaltered republication of the fifth revised and corrected edition (copyright 1891)". They are printed in bright orange covers and are substantially smaller than the original large hardbacks. I really like this Dover edition. The Elibron reprint is not near as satisfying as the Dover. It is a reprint of an 1887 edition from Lippincott of London. It is a facsimilie, rather than a reprint. Unfortuately it is a very dirty facsimilie, and what is worse, volume 1 is printed in TWO volumes called Part 1 and Part 2. I thought I bought the two volume set but I actually only got volume one in two parts. Anyway, the two volumes are larger than the original volume one. There are quite a few different editions calling themselves the "fifth revised and corrected edition", with a variety of dates in the late 1800s. I have not done a careful analysis to see what differs amongst them. A quick glance shows that they are substantially identical. Chauvenet's work is far more mathematical than any Bowditch edition, and the math is much more like 20th century math than other works from the period. What I mean by that is that I can understand his notation much better than I can other technical works from a similar period in time. I actually like to read textbooks, so I would differ from George and say that this work IS a good book to curl up by the fireplace with. Perhaps not as enjoyable as a good Patrick O'Brian read, but still a very interesting work with the state-of-the-art in the mathematics of navigation from the 1860s. Highly recommended. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of Marc Bernstein Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 4:18 PM To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM Subject: Chauvenet Both volumes of Chauvenet are available as reprints from Elibron Vol 1 http://www.elibron.com/english/other/item_detail.phtml?msg_id=10020216 Vol 2 http://www.elibron.com/english/other/item_detail.phtml?msg_id=10020218 --------------------------------------- Marc Bernstein Denver NY ----------------------------------------