Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Celnav article in Ocean Navigator Magazine
    From: Stan K
    Date: 2016 May 10, 17:34 -0400
    This is what I said to someone else about the article at the beginning of April:

    "Someone would have to do a statistical study to see if using the median works any better than using the mean, especially after outliers are removed, and I'm not sure which method is easier.  Assuming a run of five sights, using the mean you would have to do five time averages, five altitude averages, and one sight reduction.  Using the median you would have to do five sight reductions.  Looks like a wash to me."


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gary LaPook <NoReply_LaPook@fer3.com>
    To: slk1000 <slk1000@aol.com>
    Sent: Tue, May 10, 2016 4:19 pm
    Subject: [NavList] Celnav article in Ocean Navigator Magazine

    There is an article in the curent issue of Ocean Navigator Magazine that is interesting and brings up topics that we have discussed here often in the past such as averging shots, "cocked hat," anvancing lines to a common time using the "motion of the observer" tables, etc. Take a few minutes to read it here:
    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site