NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Celestial Navigation without a sextant.
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2008 Mar 8, 17:39 -0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2008 Mar 8, 17:39 -0000
40 South asked- | Supposing one was in a small boat with an accurate timepiece and the | necessary tables, how accurate could you determine your longitude by | observing the rising or setting of the sun or any other celestial | body? There have been several responses, but I suggest that they have missed an important point. Yes, in theory, if you happen to know your latitude well, then an observation of the moment of Sunrise will give your local time, which can be compared with Greenwich time to give your longitude. You could use the predictions in the Nautical Almanac, but these are to the nearest minute of time only, and for Greenwich noon at the middle day of a block of three days, and for broad bands of latitude. You could interpolate, to some extent, but a better way would be to do the job by trig or tables, for that known latitude, date, and time, allowing for Sun semidiameter, refraction, and dip. The best you can expect is to observe a sunrise from the Equator, near the equinox, when it comes vertically out of the sea at 15 degrees in each hour. At other latitudes, and other times, the ascent of the Sun is at a shallower angle, much shallower at high latitudes, so its rate of rise is correspondingly less, and any error in measuring Sun altitude reflects in an enhanced error in time, and therefore in longitude. Now, here's the rub. Although sunrise/sunset predictions are based on a presumed value of refraction, at an observed altitude of 0 degrees, which will be something like 33 or 34 arc-minutes, that is no more than a rough approximation. At sunrise/sunset, the light is having to pass through an immense thickness of atmosphere, at a glancing angle, and is badly affected by unknown and unpredictable refraction as it passes through the various air layers, at unknown temperatures. That is why the Sun's image can get so distorted as it nears the horizon, and even if there's no apparent distortion, the whole Sun can get displaced, vertically, by these refraction effects. It's not unusual for the actual refraction at the horizon to be half a degree out from that predicted value, sometimes even more, so depending on its sign, it could double, or nullify, the predicted refraction.. In polar latitude, the effects can be greater still. That's why navigators keep clear of celestial altitudes when they are less than 10 degrees or so. At higher altitudes, refraction is much less, and, more important, more precisely predictable. Measured at the equator, every minute of refraction error will result in a 4-second error in timing sunrise, and thus a 1 minute error in longitude. At higher latitudes, the errors will be enhanced. So timing sunrise/sunset will never provide a precise value for longitude. But if a rough ball-park figure will suffice, it could do the job. 40South continues- | Also, assuming you had a compass and were north or south of the | tropics, would it be possible to estimate your latitude by taking a | bearing of the setting or rising of a celestial body? I'm not sure why he applies the restriction of being "north or south of the tropics". Again, in theory, yes. Again, it's affected by the vagaries of refraction near the horizon. But a bigger source of error is the difficulty of measuring that bearing. On land, with a theodolite and a known North-South line, it can be measured precisely. At sea, it's affected by the uncertanties of the magnetic compass. It's hard to read azimuth to better than a degree or so at the best of times, and then there are additional errors in allowing for deviation and variation. Historically, a sunrise/sunset azimuth was used the other way round. With latitude known (from a noon Sun sight, followed by a bit of DR) it was used, on a wooden vessel, to check magnetiic variation. George. contact George Huxtable at george@huxtable.u-net.com or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---