NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: CelNav without sextant
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 2, 16:10 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 2, 16:10 -0500
Bill, Compass, as I understand, is somewhat imprecise instrument. (The one I have permits 1/2 degree in the best case, but i am still considering buying a better one:-) In the "thought experiment" I propose I assume that a compass (and THUS dead reckoning) is available. The question is : do we have means to improve on that (or to check our dead reckoning) by CelNav without a sextant. I suppose the answer is "yes". On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Noyce, Bill wrote: > As another way to use rising and setting of stars -- how about > using the compass to identify the azimuth at which some circumpolar > stars rise and set? I suspect that could tell you your latitude > with reasonable accuracy, even without a watch. Even if you can > only read the compass to a couple of degrees, I think the > uncertainty in such a latitude will depend more on the uncertainty > of refraction at the horizon. For example, consider a star whose > path just grazes the northern horizon -- that tells us our latitude > without being very dependent on the azimuth measurement. > > With a watch, you can get latitude from the length of time a star > far from the equator is above (or below) the horizon. Perhaps you > could also estimate when it's directly in line with the celestial > pole, allowing you to measure some stars whose rise or set occurs > during the day. > -- Bill >