Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Cel nav in space
    From: Renee Mattie
    Date: 2005 Jan 12, 15:11 -0500

    Anything could, presumably, travel at a relative velocity close to c.
    It's just that the energy required to accelerate the mass to that
    velocity is enormous.
    According to Special Relativity, Neutrinos travel at close to the speed
    of light (assuming they have mass), or else at the speed of light
    (assuming they have no rest mass).  They're a little hard to pin down.
    Of course, we know that Einstein's General and Special Relativity don't
    agree with quantum theory, and string theorists
    tell us that relativity doesn't get it quite right.  It is possible that the
    neutrino doesn't actually exist.  It *MIGHT BE* possible to exceed the speed
    of light, but
    maybe only for subatomic particles.
    I doubt that there will be any practical application of near-light
    (speed relative to the stars near enough to steer by) or faster-than-light
    navigation within my lifetime or that of my children.
    It is fun to think about, though.  Figuring the corrections to apparant
    or apparant angles between distant bodies due to refraction caused by
    is one thing.  Figuring position and orientation from the angles between
    stars from
    various points in the galaxy (Are you SURE you could recognize Vega if you
    were right
    next to Alpha Centauri?), correcting angles for the Lorentz contraction as a
    of relative speed and angle relative to your direction of travel -- well,
    you won't get
    by with a copy of Bennets and a lifeboat sextant.
    Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to this thread.
    Something my daughter (a six-year-old aspiring astronaut) and I can enjoy
    looking into.
    Well, perhaps in a few years, after she has had a chance to study trig.
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Navigation Mailing List
    > [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM] On Behalf Of Peter Fogg
    > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:11 PM
    > Subject: Re: [NAV-L] Cel nav in space
    > Does anything (apart from electro-magnetic energy itself)
    > travel at speeds close to c?
    > ________________________________________
    > Frank Reed wrote:
    > At 99% of the speed of light, time aboard ship would slow by
    > a factor of 7.
    > So for shipboard passengers, the trip would only take 290
    > thousand years.
    > Hmmm... Still stinks. Ok, let's crank it up to 99.99% of c.
    > That raises the time dilation factor to 70.7 so the trip
    > would take merely 29 thousand years. Every "pair of nines" in
    > that fraction of c adds a factor of ten to the time dilation
    > so to get the journey down to less than three years of
    > shipboard time, we would need to travel at 99.99 99 99 99 99%
    > of the speed of light. You age three years aboard ship,
    > everything else ages two million years (time dilation factor
    > is 1000000/sqrt(2).

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site