Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Captain Cook's Sep 07th, 1773 Lunar revisited
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2012 Jul 23, 11:25 -0700

    ... and by the way, just a little add-on to my recent posts, so everybody on NavList will feel comfortable.

    I do acknowledge that when I publish own computation results with so many digits, the RIGHTMOST DIGIT(S) HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PHYSICAL SIGNIFICANCE AT ALL. Take as an example, my recent following sentence [QUOTE] Cook did observe a reported Sextant Distance of 105°47'04" while he should have observed an actual Distance of 105°47'55"9 [UNQUOTE]

    The only aim of publishing 1 (or even - shame on me !!! - 2) extra digits is to offer - to whoever will check his computations and results against my own numbers - such extra digits which can prove quite useful.

    A most recent example ? When Paul observed his own height results for both Sun LL and Moon UL [QUOTE] the observed Sun altitude is 3.8' less than the computed value, and the Moon altitude 3.9' less [UNQUOTE], we both almost immediately made the link to the 3'50" dip correction I initially had omitted, a fact that took me only a matter of seconds to ascertain. However, it is more than probable than such altitudes - taken with a wooden Octant - were recorded to an accuracy certainly no better than 1 ', or even 3', if not 5' or maybe up to 10', we ALL know that, and we also all know why since achieving any kind of deadly accuracy was not that critical for the observed heights themselves.

    Same for my indications of the TT-UT I am keeping quoting : +16.4 s here. It is most probable that TT-UT is now known - and will EVER stay so - to an accuracy probably NO BETTER THAN up to 4 seconds of Time, which is equivalent to an uncertainty of 2" on the Moon Coordinates - not bad already for a period 240 years back ! - while the Moon Tables at the time of Cook (1773) were barely more accurate than 20" from what we can cross-check to-day.

    However, quoting these NO PHYSICAL SENSE digits can be very helpful - to only just a few of us I agree - in order to enable checking the consistency - and possible "fine tuning" - of computations, whether they be yours or some colleagues's. To the (maybe vast majority of) NavList Members who might be silently irritated at such a waste of digits, my most sincere apologies.

    So, I really think that nobody on NavList should and even is really being abused by such extra digits, no ?

    Best Regards

    Kermit

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site