Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Can I Navigate Without an Assumed Position?
    From: Hien Thanh Nguyen
    Date: 2017 Sep 12, 17:13 -0400
    Hi Yves,

    Your proposal sounds very interesting. Would you be able to share your paper/algorithm with us? I am also thinking of a method for finding a fix without  the use of the AP location. It would be nice to have a method like yours to serve as a reference.


    On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Robin Jouan <NoReply_RobinJouan@fer3.com> wrote:

    Just a remark : Generally, 3D matrix methods can spare any assumed or arbitrary position as an input. The reason is they are not based on a differential formulation, but on a global formulation.

    With my own method ("Coplanar Vertices Method") the assumed position is used only to find its distance to the computed solution at the end of the process.

    In fact what you need is only a sextant and a small computer: a palm PC or a smartphone can do the job, as well as a few "old" TI or HP devices (HP200XL is a famous one).

    Best Regards


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site