Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Calculator v. Slide Rule for Ex-Meridian Correction
    From: Francis Upchurch
    Date: 2016 Jan 2, 20:29 -0800

    Thanks all for comments on slide rules. Seems only celnav nav triangle (eg cosine )formulae for LOPs/Hc and lunars requires better than 4 places, most other things ok at 3 places, is that correct?(hence the use of cylindrical rules like the Bygrave and Fuller 2 for cel nav.). 

    However, does anyone know the answer to my first question re the JS Letcher statement on page 92 that his version of the lunar clearance formula can be done satisfactorily on a standard trig slide rule, wheres he says on the same page that for lunars you have to use ultimate accuracy for exery step to 0.1'?

    I shall now try it and the Karl formulae ( also page 92/93 in his book!) with my Thornton 1960s 10" (used it as a 15 year old for "o"  level and "A"  maths and physics!)and compare with calculator and Fuller 2. Happy days.

    Best wishes


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site