Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    The Bygrave Slide Rule
    From: UNK
    Date: 2009 May 27, 14:57 -0700

    I was asked recently to help a friend who wanted to understand the Bygrave 
    Slide Rule (BSR). He sent me references to most of the internet postings, 
    and Google helped me find more, including this forum. I have improvised such a 
    device using scales printed on transparent sheets using computer programs I 
    wrote for the purpose. A most interesting project.
    
    I am posting here now because I believe that some of the recent writings on 
    the internet about the BSR may be misleading. I refer to the assertion by 
    Gary LaPook (GLP) and Ron van Riet (RVR) that the inner scale of the BSR is 
    actually a cotangent scale and not a tangent scale. The patent application, 
    and the original manual of the BSR talk about tangents, so RVR and GLP seem 
    to be suggesting that Bygrave may have made a mistake somewhere, even if 
    only in the documentation.  It seems quite reasonable to me that this scale 
    can be described as a tangent scale. I think I can explain why this question 
    arose in the first place.
    
    A conventional sliderule has a linear scale showing 1.0 at the left end and 
    10.0 at the right, the distance to a specific value from the left end being 
    proportional to the logarithm of that value. The convention is clearly that 
    the numbers (and their logarithms) increase from left to right along the 
    scale. The inner scale of a BSR, if unwrapped horizontally, shows near-zero 
    degrees at the left end and near-90 degrees at the right end, and the 45 
    degree mark is in the exact centre of the scale. We know that tangents of 
    angles less than 45 degrees are less than one, and hence that logarithms of 
    tangents of angles less than 45 degrees are negative. Similarly logs of tans 
    of angles greater than 45 degrees are positive.
    
    The inner scale of the BSR, considered as a tangent scale, is oriented so 
    that the logarithm of the tangent increases left-to-right in the conventional 
    way.  It IS reasonable to say this is a logarithmic tangent scale.
    
    So why are we discussing this at all? The point is that if BOTH scales were 
    laid out in this way, the degree markings on the two scales would run in 
    opposite directions. This arises since the tangent function INCREASES with 
    increasing angle whereas the cosine function DECREASES. Several people have 
    suggested that this would be prone to user error and Bygrave must have 
    realised this. The BSR does have both degree scales running left-to-right. 
    So how did Bygrave do it?
    
    Given that I have suggested that the inner scale is laid out in a reasonable 
    way as a tangent scale, and that BOTH scales on the BSR have the degree 
    markings left-to-right, I suggest that Bygrave achieved his objective by reversing the COSINE scale.
    
    The clever part is the way that Bygrave gets this reversed cosine scale to 
    give the right answer.  On a conventional slide rule, multiplication of X*Y 
    is done by aligning the origen of the slider scale with X on the fixed 
    scale, then reading off the product on the fixed scale opposite Y on the 
    slider. The instructions with the BSR for the tan(X)/cos(Y) operation follow 
    this precise procedure (think of inner=fixed and outer=sliding). Bygrave 
    has cleverly transposed the multiply and divide instructions so that they 
    give the right answer with the reversed log(cosine) scale. A reversed 
    log(cosine) scale is the same as a log(1/cosine) scale so Bygrave is 
    tricking us into multiplying by (1/cos(Y)) with the reversed cosine scale 
    when he wants us to divide by cos(Y). A similar trick is used where Bygrave 
    wants us to multiply by cosine, instructing us to perform the actions which 
    we would normally use on a conventional slide rule to divide.
    
    The argument as to whether the inner scale is a tangent or a cotangent, (or 
    whether the outer scale is a cosine or a secant) really comes down to 
    whether you think of 'up' and 'left-to-right' as positive or negative. Bygrave 
    used the terms 'tangent/cosine' in the theory, and 'inner/outer' in the 
    instructions. There is no need for the end-user to know that one scale has 
    been cleverly reversed so that he doesn't make mistakes reading off the 
    degrees.
    
    regards
    Peter Martinez
    
    --------------------------------------------------------
    [Sent from archive by: peter.martinez-AT-btinternet.com]
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site