NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
British Summer Time versus GMT
From: Debra Hillman
Date: 2013 Dec 13, 12:19 +1100
From: Debra Hillman
Date: 2013 Dec 13, 12:19 +1100
Does GMT change to british summertime to be able to have the correct time for using a nautical almanac?
> From: FrankReed@HistoricalAtlas.com
> To: wombatroo@hotmail.com
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:48:47 -0800
> Subject: [NavList] Radio-quiet oceans and emergency navigation
>
> I found a message from one of the earlier incarnations of NavList dating back to December 1995 (on lunars) which I've posted in January 1996 in the main message boards. Here are the messages from that year:
> http://www.fer3.com/arc/sort2.aspx?y=1996&sort=du.
> That old message plus my recent ten-year anniversary on here have got me thinking about the long-term changes in the status of traditional navigation including some that are maybe a little surprising.
>
> We've often discussed radio direction-finding as a method of emergency navigation. But radio is disappearing as fast as the Internet advances. Broadcast radio is rapidly disappearing in the frequency bands most useful for direction-finding. There are fewer and fewer high-power, long-range AM stations around the world, except in major cities and along the highways that lead to them. Suppose, for example, that you were making that trip I suggested for "spoofing celestial" back in August. You're sailing from Hawaii to Tahiti. How many AM stations could you actually pick up approaching the Marquesas and then Tahiti if you decided to try this sort of emergency navigation? Is it feasible anymore away from large cities? Are the oceans going radio-quiet?
>
> -FER
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
> Members may optionally receive posts by email.
> To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125693
>
>
>
> To: wombatroo@hotmail.com
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:48:47 -0800
> Subject: [NavList] Radio-quiet oceans and emergency navigation
>
> I found a message from one of the earlier incarnations of NavList dating back to December 1995 (on lunars) which I've posted in January 1996 in the main message boards. Here are the messages from that year:
> http://www.fer3.com/arc/sort2.aspx?y=1996&sort=du.
> That old message plus my recent ten-year anniversary on here have got me thinking about the long-term changes in the status of traditional navigation including some that are maybe a little surprising.
>
> We've often discussed radio direction-finding as a method of emergency navigation. But radio is disappearing as fast as the Internet advances. Broadcast radio is rapidly disappearing in the frequency bands most useful for direction-finding. There are fewer and fewer high-power, long-range AM stations around the world, except in major cities and along the highways that lead to them. Suppose, for example, that you were making that trip I suggested for "spoofing celestial" back in August. You're sailing from Hawaii to Tahiti. How many AM stations could you actually pick up approaching the Marquesas and then Tahiti if you decided to try this sort of emergency navigation? Is it feasible anymore away from large cities? Are the oceans going radio-quiet?
>
> -FER
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
> Members may optionally receive posts by email.
> To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125693
>
>
>