Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Bris Sextant pictures
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2005 Nov 4, 21:43 -0000

    Herbert Prinz wrote-
    
    > Thank you for the images of your Bris Sextant (does it actually deserve
    > the name 'sextant' ? It's some kind of a goniometer).
    
    I agree with Herbert. It's not a sextant, by ANY definition. To qualify as a
    sextant, the arc of which occupies a sixth of a circle, it should measure
    angles up to 120 degrees. The Bris device does not do so, nor does it allow
    arbitrary angles to be measured, just a few spot values to be compared.
    Another name than sextant needs to be agreed on. Any suggestions?
    
    It seems a clever little device, which may well have its uses. For example,
    if it has sufficient long-term stability,  it could perhaps provide some
    calibration checkpoints for a true sextant, over part of its range..
    
    What about the dark glass that's used at the side that faces the Sun?
    Presumably, that has to be dark enough to make it comfortable to view the
    Sun image. Agreed, the brightness of that image is reduced somewhat by the
    dimming of reflections in the unsilvered glass, which means that a less-dark
    outer glass may be acceptable, compared with the shade required for a
    sextant. But my concern is this; that the horizon, also, has to be viewed
    through that same dark glass, and unless the horizon is particularly clear
    and bright, it won't be seen sharply enough for a measurement. Is that a
    handicap, in practice?  Is there, or could there be, an additional shade
    glass on an arm, to put it just in the way of the light from the Sun,
    without darkening the horizon view?
    
    Another question that's puzzling me a bit, and I'm still trying to visualise
    it. There's nothing (presumably) to define where your eye is to go, such as
    is provided by the eyepiece of a sextant or the peep of some octants. Is the
    device then subject to some sort of "collimation error", if the eye is put
    at the wrong place? If not, why not?
    
    George
    
    contact George Huxtable at george---.u-net.com
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    
    Another question. Can you improve the accuracy achievable with such a
    device, by holding it (or strapping it with sticky-tape) in front of the
    objective of a sextant's telescope?
    
    George.
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site