Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Brent's Double Altitude Method
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2016 Aug 25, 14:39 -0700

    "I determined my position Brent's method using  mid-morning and  mid-afternoon sights. I have attached the plot. I hope that it makes sense "

    David.  A little more detail would have made it easier to follow your work.  You don’t say what the body was.  From your use of ‘mid-morning’ and mid-afternoon, I presume it was the Sun.  Neither do you say what zone the times of your shots were.  10.25 and 15.22 suggest UTC +12. You don’t give azimuths or heights calculated or the method you used to calculate them.  If you were using something like AP3270/NP303/HO249, then AP1 (or is it AP2?) would be dictated by the fact that the tables are entered using whole numbers of degrees latitude and LHA.

    I don’t get the next bit.  You say “The second sight is worked as an intercept using the lat/long from the first sight as an assumed position” This looks like sorcery to me.  There’s no way you can get a lat & long fix from a single position line.  Two shots on the same body several hours apart, maybe; a Zenith Fix, yes; but not a single position line.  The nearest thing to a fix you can get from a single PL is a most probable position (MPP) by comparing it with your DR position.  Perhaps I’m interpreting what you wrote incorrectly.  You obviously used something other that rapid sight reduction tables for your second height calculated, because the longitude you ended up with for AP2 (or was it AP1?) would have been unlikely to leave you with an LHA equal to a whole number of degrees.  

    You said, "Brent said plot the largest bearing (azimuth?) first".  I’m having considerable difficulty following your diagram.  Which came first in time AP1 or AP2?  It would help to have a time against each.  Logically it would be AP1 for the mid-morning shot, and the intercept would be around 8 away.  However, if AP1 was for the mid-afternoon shot (because Brent says plot the largest bearing first), the intercept would be zero, and the intercept for the 10.25 shot would be 1 away from AP2.  I'm confused! DaveP  

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site