Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Bligh's noon by chronometer
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2010 May 31, 06:05 -0700

    Ah ???

    I thought he would have used :

    sin H = sin Lat * sin Dec + cos Lat * cos Dec * cos T , with both Lat and Dec being (adequately) known, then it should (might?) have been straightforward (and hopefully achievable with 10log tables) to reckon Local apparent Time " T " ...

    Well ... at least we need a sufficient time between time of height observation and Apparent Noon Time - certainly and least a couple of hours here - simply because we are solving for a Cosine here, and by Apparent Noon time, T = 0 and solving it through its Cosine is not wonderfully accurate.

    Am I missing something ?

    Best Regards

    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site