Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Bias and cocked hats
    From: Dave Walden
    Date: 2007 Apr 18, 17:54 -0700

    > > For three equally spaced observations
    > Is this a sound assumption?
    Vol 1 of the Air Almanac can provide a good set of 3 for any time any
    place.  It's a not "unreasonable" assumption and provides an
    interesting and useful result.  I would not expect too much
    sensativity.  Try some runs.
    >  ... and independent normally distributed random errors
    > Is this assumption of only random errors reliable? What happens if some
    > systematic error is also involved?
    It's again a reasonable assumption and I would estimate the first
    order approximation.
    If by systematic error you mean something other than a constant bias,
    I suppose there could be an error proportional to altitude for
    example.  But for measurements between 30 and 60 or so I would think
    the chance of such an error being significant is unlikely.  And even
    more unlikely to be large and unknown.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site