NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Back sights
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2010 Mar 22, 11:44 -0400
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2010 Mar 22, 11:44 -0400
In answer to my own question, I found the following http://www.lewisandclarknavigation.org/InstrumentCalibration.htm About midway down the page, the author has drawn the optical path for a foresight and a backsight observation. It appears that the paths are parallel but not co-linear. The optical path for the backsight mirror to the index mirror is to the inside of, but does not cross the optics of, the foresight horizon mirror. Best Regards Brad -----Original Message----- From: navlist-bounce@fer3.com [mailto:navlist-bounce@fer3.com] On Behalf Of Brad Morris Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:27 AM To: NavList@fer3.com Subject: [NavList] Re: Back sights In adjusting the octant or sextant for index error, there is nothing to stop you from adjusting or determining it on land and then using that value at sea. Being as land based as Chauvenet, all my star-star sights are on a stable platform. There is another dilemma concerning the BackSight Octant that I am attempting to resolve in my head. The octant has only one arc. That is, the scale on the arc is singular. There aren't two scales, one for foresights and the other for backsights. For a foresight, for a given angle, the nonius will indicate that value. But the backsight is to be used to measure the same angle. I believe that the index mirror does not move, because the nonius itself cannot move, else it would indicate a different angular value. What therefore, is the arrangement of the backsight mirror relative to the foresight mirror? The backsight mirror must be parallel to the foresight mirror, in order to obtain the same angular value. The optical path from the backsight mirror to the index mirror must then somehow cross through the foresight horizon mirror. Is the backsight mirror slit further away from the plane of the arc, permitting the optical path to go through the clear part of the horizon mirror? If the paths are parallel but not co-linear, then the index mirror must be larger to support this offset. Is there some graphical optical path explanation existent, one perhaps for a real octant we can examine online? Best Regards Brad "Confidentiality and Privilege Notice The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you."