NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Azimuths, WAS: Accuracy of sextant observations at sea
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2010 Sep 24, 10:09 EDT
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2010 Sep 24, 10:09 EDT
We are supposed to shoot azimuths once every watch, but usually it happens
two or three times a day. We need to track and check the error of our gyro
compass as well as double checking the deviation table on the standard
compass. It is, in fact, the only real celestial navigation done on
commercial ships at sea on a regular basis. There is a log book kept for
this.
Tos shoot azimuths, we put either an azimuth circle or alidade on a gyro
repeater and take the sight of a celestial body. The most common body is
the sun; but stars, the moon, and planets can all be used. I find Alidades
the most accurate due to the magnification of the scope and the hair sight in
the optic. The trick is to keep the repeater level during the observation
and there is a bubble to help do this. For alidade sights, I can
reasonably shoot to the nearest 0.25 degree with any body , and with the azimuth
circle (especially of the sun) to the nearest 0.5 degree. The biggest
problem is that the repeaters only display whole degrees, so you are eye-ball
interpolating between the hash marks.
Jeremy
In a message dated 9/23/2010 7:45:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pmh099@yahoo.com writes:
Jeremy,
I'm curious whether you could give us some additional details (e.g. "why" and "how") about these shots of azimuths. Thanks.
Peter Hakel
I actually have little faith in Polaris. The star is dim and the horizon is rarely good when I observe it. I tend to get better results from 1st order stars which I observe with the best possible horizon available. The only real advantage these days is that it is easy to reduce by table. It is also a favorite of the second mates to shoot azimuths.Jeremy
[rest deleted by PH]