Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Azimuth method for position
    From: Geoffrey Kolbe
    Date: 2017 Oct 21, 08:37 -0700

    Francis Upchurch wrote:

    I've most likely got this completely wrong, but what about doing a kind of "lunar" with a sextant horizontal, measure angle between Polaris and another stars? Would that give us accurate Azimuths for this method? Experts please comment.

    Despite your last sentence, I would comment that a theodolite would be the more natural instrument for azimuth measurements. That would be on land, of course. I see no way to measure azimuths with any accuracy at sea. I do not see how you could use a sextant to measure azimuths except for objects very near the horizon, which would limit such a technique to very low latitudes in the Northern hemisphere using Polaris.

    On land, it is (was) fairly routine practice to use azimuth measurements of Polaris or the Sun to reference a survey to true North. This was from a known latitude and longitude, of course. Where you are attempting to find latitude and longitude, it is always far more efficient to use the altitudes of celestial bodies rather than azimuths, even with a theodolite.

    Geoffrey Kolbe

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site