# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Averaging
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Oct 6, 23:45 -0500

```Many manuals advise to take several sights
in short sequence and then to average the result.
and to reduce the average as one sight.
(Chauvenet recommends at most 6, Russian manuals 3-5).
The purpose is to increase accuracy,
and, probably more importantly, to reject the sights
with an evident "human error".

Recently I was asked off-the-list by Bill Burchill,
what is the effect of the motion of the vessel
on these repeated sights
(they are all taken from different positions!)

As I did not find an answer in Bowdich (or Norie, or other manuals),
I think this should be

CORRECTIONS BY MORE EXPERIENCED navigators.

a sailboat or even an aircraft carrier.
(However, I imagine that this recommendation has to be modified
for a navigator of a strategic bomber flying at 600 knots.
it had to be done by cell nav before GPS era, and if you are over an
ocean).

So, suppose your vessel moves at 10 knots, (10nm/hour=(1/6)mile/min
=10"/min),
and you take 5 altitude sights with the interval
of approx. 1 minute. Then the maximal change in the altitudes
due to your motion will be of the order of 50", =approx 1'.
Thus it seems that on such a small interval, all your
altitudes (those taken correctly) will lie on a straight line
when plotted against GMT.

This justifies the recipe: take the average of your altitudes
and the average of your GMT, and reduce these averages,
and the resulting position line will pass through your place
at the average observation time.

What is probably done in practice, is first plotting
your altitudes against GMT, then looking for a straignt
line which passes most closely through MOST of your dots,
then discarding those observations which are far away from
this line (this rejects crude human eroor),
then averaging the times and the altitudes of the rest,
and reducing this average.

This recipe should indeed increase the accuracy,
reject the sights with large "human error", and thus
be more precise and more reliable than a single observation.

Unless you are on the strategic bomber mentioned above,
in which case the recipe does not seem to be applicable.
(I have never seen a strategic bomber (or commertial aircraft)
navigators manuals).

Alex.

```
Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)