Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Attempting to decipher a "time sight"
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2016 May 30, 14:49 -0700

    Stan, you wrote:
    "I note that there is a typo in either Hart's original or your transcription. It shows the sum correctly as 19.37899. Half of this is 9.689495, so, to five decimal places, the half-sum should be either 9.68949 or 9.68950, but not 9.68849. The time shown of 3-54-16 is correct for 9.68949 (or so)."

    Thanks! I was curious enough to check, and it turns out the typo was in the original (I would have guessed it arose in auto-transcription, but that is so good these days...). I've attached below a screen capture from the original page with the section I quoted previously. I wonder if Hart got letters from attentive readers back then?!

    Also I'm including a screen cap of another reference to a time sight in the same book which I discovered just now by searching on "secant" as a quick way to get to the page with the calculation. This one Hart intended for comedy. For us today it's yet another example of my claim that navigation was acceptable as "women's work" back then.

    Frank Reed



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site