NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Attachments on Nav-L list
From: Geoffrey Kolbe
Date: 2005 Aug 28, 12:41 +0100
From: Geoffrey Kolbe
Date: 2005 Aug 28, 12:41 +0100
No Frank, It was me that objected to spending half an hour downloading graphs I did not want, just to get them off the server and get rid of them. We don't all have broadband connections and we don't all have computers with turbo-charged CPU's and terabytes of memory to spare. We don't even all have computers that have a mouse! With very little effort, there is no need for general attachments to the list. The rule about no attachments on this list is a good one. Let us stick to it please. Geoffrey Kolbe >Bah. Attachments are no big deal. Anyone who says otherwise is just running >you through a 'fraternity initiation rite'. Long-term members of the list >have used attachments on a regular basis. You can sort the list archives "by >attachment" if it interests you. > >That said, clicking on an attachment requires an extra flex of the mousing >finger muscle and this is precious energy that many list members cannot spare >(myself included), >-FER >42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. >www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
