
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Artificial horizons
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Jan 3, 22:32 -0500
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Jan 3, 22:32 -0500
Bruce, Oil works for bright stars. Blackening the pan (spraying with ultra flat black enamel) helps a lot, especially when street or houselights get in the line of sight. I think it also obviates the need for darkened oil. This on the lines of Bruce Bauer's black-painted horizon mirror. I'm wondering whether a thin layer of oil on top of water, especially maybe black-dyed water, would have a higher reflectivity. The mirror I was using was a standard wall mirror, about 20 x 30 inches. The large size was very helpful in identifying targets, as I could see whole constellations. However, the frame prevented leveling with a long level, and the surface additionally was detectably unflat. Leveling with thin wedges worked well enough. My fancy new (1948-vintage) Husun has a dark lens that fits on the telescope, for determining index error, which considerably reduces sun glare from mirrors. There were double reflections from the top and bottom surfaces of the mirror; shades may have helped here. When purchasing spirit levels, make sure they read the same when pointed in both directions and turned upside down, if capable of that. Only the more expensive do so, in my experience. I can barely detect a movement of 14 minutes of arc in my masons level. Perhaps other levels are more sensitive. I tested the sensitivity by wedging with sheets of paper from a thick ream of measured thickness and known number. Thanks for the help with the Gaussians. Hope to get back on that shortly. Fred