Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Artificial horizon question
    From: Robert Eno
    Date: 2009 Apr 20, 21:32 -0400

    I'll throw in my two bits' worth based on over 25 years' experience using
    these finicky things.
    First off, I agree with an earlier poster about mercury being ideal for
    stars. That being said, the stuff is hard to find, is highly toxic and
    therefore not recommended.
    Of all the AHs I've used, the Frieberger black glass is the best of the
    bunch. C.Plath used to make them and I have been trying to find one but they
    are virtually non-existent.
    Ok, let's cut to the chase: the best way to view stars is to get your
    eyeball/sextant as close to the artificial horizon as you can. What I have
    done with pretty good success is to raise the AH on a platform till it is
    about at your chest level (sitting down or standing up). In this way, you
    can more easily discern the reflected star image. Simple as that.
    I hasten to add that this works well for 1st magnitude stars and planets but
    not so well for 2nd and 3rd magnitude bodies. The black glass tends to suck
    up the light. This is where mercury has its advantages.
    Oh yes, I agree that edge to edge images are the way to go. Trying to
    superimpose is difficult and not very precise.
    Good luck and good hunting.
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 7:45 PM
    Subject: [NavList 8006] Re: Artificial horizon question
    George, GL and Peter,
    Thank you all for continuing to offer helpful advice.  To answer some of
    George's questions about the horizon I am using, it is the inexpensivce
    Davis model, and has a sloped-roof type of cover, with solid plastic sides
    ("gables" if you will) and clear or colored plastic panes.  The panes appear
    to be quite flat as far as one can tell by looking.  No doubt they are cut
    from large sheets after emerging from a pair of rollers set to a precise
    tolerance.  Perhaps in cooling or handling they acquire some irregularity.
    Moreover, the image is passing through the panes more or less normal to the
    surface.  It may be refracted a bit going through, but I don't think I'm
    seeing and extra reflection, as I might if I were reflecting the sun off a
    stack of horizontal plates.  Again, it may be reflecting from the top and
    bottom of the pan, so I will try some light-deadening measure on the bottom.
    When I see the reflected sun in the pan of mineral oil, it is very distinct
    and solid, and depending on the cover I have over it, may be bright yellow.
    As I bring the sun down from the sky, again viewing through various filters,
    it will appear to the right of the yellow reflected image and will be,
    perhaps bright green or blue (depends on the filter).  There is no mistaking
    which is which, and no particular impression that either image is double.
    They will be separated horizontally anywhere from two to four or five
    diameters apart, but as I squirm and squint, fiddle with the telescope focus
    and the micrometer, and try to hold my toes just the right way, they drift
    slowly together, then apart again. It's much like watching the little
    floating debris on the surface of your eye; you can sort of chase it in one
    direction by eye-rolling or will power, but it always wants to slide back.
    But I digress.
    I'll give your suggestions a try next time I'm out.  I'm especially grateful
    that some of you pointed out the advantage of getting the images
    edge-to-edge rather than totally coincident.  Let's see if this improves my
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site