NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Artificial horizon question
From: Jackie Ferrari
Date: 2009 Apr 20, 08:12 +0100
From: Jackie Ferrari
Date: 2009 Apr 20, 08:12 +0100
I've got good results for the moon and sun in a bucket of water on calm days . I once tried a star and managed its reflection ok using the method Gary mentions. This was in Italy up in the mountains so no light pollution but I do recall the reflection was still very faint and the results not too good. Jackie. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary LaPook"To: Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:44 AM Subject: [NavList 7993] Re: Artificial horizon question > > Mercury has traditionally been used for an artificial horizon (see Lewis > & Clark) and it is easy to shoot stars using Mercury. It is rather hard > to come by these days and is not cheap and some worry about its safety > (I'm not one of them if used with care.) > > The second part of your question, compute in advance the approximate > altitude of the star, double it and set your sextant to this value and > then look for the star in the reflecting pool. The navigational stars > are well separated and are bright so there should be no trouble in > getting the right star. > > gl > > P H wrote: >> Dear NavList Members, >> >> Since the nearest ocean is hundreds of miles away from where I live, I >> must use an artificial horizon in order to work with my sextant. A >> pan filled with water works fine enough for me for observations of the >> moon at night and the sun. Now these days both the sun and the moon >> are simultaneously visible during the day, which would allow for a fix >> on one's position - if the altitudes of both bodies can be measured. >> As you probably can guess, with all the glare I was unable to observe >> the reflection of the moon... so here is my question: are there any >> tricks that would allow one to construct a usable artificial horizon >> for the daytime observation of the moon? And to take it one notch >> further, how about an artificial horizon for the stars and planets (at >> night, of course)? Are there any systematic methods to ensure that >> the star reflected on the surface is indeed the one I intend to observe? >> >> Many thanks. >> >> >> Peter Hakel >> >> >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---