NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2013 Jul 4, 15:09 -0700
When I teach about index correction, I like to bring out a little postal scale. If it reads 1 ounce when there's nothing on it, then it's clear to everyone that if I place an object to be weighed on it, and it displays 7 ounces, then the actual weight is 6 ounces. You subtract the "phantom" weight. The index correction for a sextant is analogous. It's just the offset from zero when it SHOULD be reading zero, like the "tare weight" of an empty scale. And if it shows some positive value (or as navigators call it, if it's "on arc"), then the offset has to be subtracted from any and all readings of the sextant before you even think about what they mean (and if it's "off arc", it has to be added, of course). It's just the instrument's scale offset. It doesn't matter if you're measuring a horizontal angle between buoys, an altitude of the Sun off the sea horizon, a lunar, or a doubled altitude from an artificial horizon. The index correction gets applied first, before you consider the meaning of the angle in any way.
-FER
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------