Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Any happy/unhappy Astra IIIB owners here?
    From: Dan Allen
    Date: 2001 Apr 20, 8:02 PM

    The kind of accuracy that these units are spec'd to (12" or 20" of arc)
    is rarely seen in practice on a rolling boat.  Errors of 1-3 miles are
    common and are acceptable for many navigational situations (mid-ocean).
    
    However, if you want to do almost surveying quality measurements, that's
    where a high power scope and the best quality sextants are needed.
    
    I continue to test my abilities by using an artificial horizon (the Davis
    one)
    in my backyard.  I set the sextant to an even angle, say 30 degrees or
    something
    near to where the sun is about to be.  I think swing the sextant until the
    sun
    gets right on the money, without adjusting the sextant.  The minute it is
    perfect
    I then glance at my GPS or accurate watch and record the time next to the
    angle
    which I had already written down.  I take a series of 10 of these
    measurements over
    as many minutes, and then I use Metcalf's nav.c to do the statistical
    analysis of
    my sights.
    
    I have the artificial horizon for my Astra, but only used it once.  I prefer
    the
    Davis mainly because I can use it with any of my sextants and I don't need
    to keep
    taking on and off the scopes.
    
    Separately I'll post cnav.c
    
    Dan
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From  Navigation Mailing List
    [mailto:NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of Yves Arrouye
    Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 6:41 PM
    To: NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
    Subject: Re: Any happy/unhappy Astra IIIB owners here?
    
    
    > I own quite a few metal sextants, and my measurements
    > indicate that Tamaya
    > and Plath are more accurate than the Astra.  I have seen used
    > Tamaya Jupiter
    > sextants sell for about the same as an Astra IIIb and I think
    > I would prefer
    > a Jupiter over an Astra given the choice, but you will be
    > quite happy with a
    > new Astra as well.
    
    Celestaire's brochure gives 20" of accuracy for the Astra IIIB against 12"
    for the Jupiter. I wish the Astra IIIB had a bronze arc, if that's the
    secret in the reduction of precision.
    
    I've always wondered: how accurate is a good sextant user? I mean, is 20"
    going to be a limiting factor? That's an error of about 1/3 of a mile
    compared to 1/5 mile for the Tamaya Jupiter, right?
    
    YA
    
    P.S.: Dan, while reading your thread about your sextant accuracy at
    http://www.i-DEADLINK-com/lists/navigation/9903/0042.html you're mentionning Tom
    Metcalf's nav.c. Where can I find that and the relevant litterature? Do I
    need to get back issues of the journal of the institute for navigation?
    
    Another question related to what you wrote there: how's the Davis artificial
    horizon compared to the practice bubble horizon sold by Celestaire?
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site