NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Any happy/unhappy Astra IIIB owners here?
From: Yves Arrouye
Date: 2001 Apr 20, 7:41 PM
From: Yves Arrouye
Date: 2001 Apr 20, 7:41 PM
> I own quite a few metal sextants, and my measurements > indicate that Tamaya > and Plath are more accurate than the Astra. I have seen used > Tamaya Jupiter > sextants sell for about the same as an Astra IIIb and I think > I would prefer > a Jupiter over an Astra given the choice, but you will be > quite happy with a > new Astra as well. Celestaire's brochure gives 20" of accuracy for the Astra IIIB against 12" for the Jupiter. I wish the Astra IIIB had a bronze arc, if that's the secret in the reduction of precision. I've always wondered: how accurate is a good sextant user? I mean, is 20" going to be a limiting factor? That's an error of about 1/3 of a mile compared to 1/5 mile for the Tamaya Jupiter, right? YA P.S.: Dan, while reading your thread about your sextant accuracy at http://www.i-DEADLINK-com/lists/navigation/9903/0042.html you're mentionning Tom Metcalf's nav.c. Where can I find that and the relevant litterature? Do I need to get back issues of the journal of the institute for navigation? Another question related to what you wrote there: how's the Davis artificial horizon compared to the practice bubble horizon sold by Celestaire?