NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Another Davis Instruments Mark 15 Question
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2003 Mar 1, 00:34 -0400
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2003 Mar 1, 00:34 -0400
I outlined my experience with my Davis Mark 25 in a posting a week or so ago. It does need care, constant checking of index errors, deliberate efforts to equilibrate temperatures and so forth but, given that, I get altitudes within a minute or so of the calculated value on a regular basis -- and not all of the error can be attributed to the instrument, no matter how much I might want to believe that my own contribution is flawless. Maybe I am just lucky with the particular instrument that I own but I most certainly don't have errors of several minutes of arc when using the filters. Granted I have not tried taking serious observations across the full arc of the instrument but I have across all altitudes that are commonly used in navigation (20 to 60 degrees or thereabouts). Maybe I should try some stars at 100+ degrees apart to see how accurate the instrument is at extreme angles. As for leaving the instrument in the sun: If you intend to take observations with the sun shining on the sextant, you had better leave it in the sun before hand or you will find yourself adjusting the horizon mirror nearly as fast as you turn the micrometer knob! To be a bit more explicit: The frame of the sextant warps as it warms and cools but it does not, in my experience, suffer any permanent warping. Of course, my experience is at around 45 degrees of latitude and air temperatures of perhaps -10 to +25 Celsius. Leaving the instrument out in the tropical sun might have more lasting effects. Still, I'd not argue with +/- 5 minutes for a Davis sextant. My own is better but perhaps I am lucky. Extremes of quality control are expensive and one of the economies that Davis takes is likely to be that some of their sextants fall short of the average precision. George, however, quoted a figure of +/- 5 _degrees_, not minutes, which would make a sextant utterly useless even for low-precision emergency navigation. I would be really surprised if any Davis sextant was anywhere near that bad, unless seriously abused by its users. Trevor Kenchington Marvin Sebourn wrote: > I would be surprised if a plastic Davis sextant would have an accuracy > of +/- 0.5 minutes throughout the arc. [snip] > > I would much rather believe +/- 5 minutes over the arc is much more > realistic than +/- 0.5', and only then with frequent IC checks. The > Celestaire catalog says that the accuracy of the Mark 15/25 is > "Unpredictable". [snip] -- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555 Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus