Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Angles without a protractor
    From: Lu Abel
    Date: 2012 Oct 12, 14:44 -0700
    Re my earlier reply about error increasing and then decreasing until it's zero at 60 degrees, without working the problem through, it's most likely that the error peaks at 30 degrees.   It's good to have a feeling for the size of the error.   Yes, 4%, but also just over one degree.   Not bad for an approximation.


    From: Alan S <alan202@verizon.net>
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 2:31 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Angles without a protractor

    Having only a couple of 30-60-90 Degree triangles handy, I checked 30 D and 60 D.
    The 30 D angle, using your approach, calculated to be 31.25 D, an error of 4%, possibly my manipulations "enhanced" this error.
    A 60 degree angle came out as 60 D. I assume that the "20", by which the distance between points is multiplied, is a constant of some sort.
    The whole thing is certainly interesting.
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site