NavList:

Hi Frank

It may not be perfect but it sounds like we both think the Salt Flats to have appropriate topography for celestial.

I'm still trying to answer Lu's student's question.  Where on earth, aside from bodies of water, is the surface appropriate for celestial.

Brad

On Oct 13, 2013 1:34 PM, "Frank Reed" <FrankReed@historicalatlas.com> wrote:
>
> ________________________________
>
> It's very flat out there on the Bonneville Salt Flats. And as you say, at low enough height of eye, the horizon will be in front of those distant mountains. The mountains could even help by providing contrast since the salt itself seen against the haze of the low altitude sky might have very little contrast. You can poke around out there a little bit in Google Maps (Street View and other photos). Park yourself on I-80 and look at the horizon. I noticed one problem right off: floating islands (see attached). Certainly for some times of day, the refraction could be prohibitive.
>
> -FER
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
> Members may optionally receive posts by email.
> To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Attached File:
>
>
> View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=125314