Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: An azimuth formula that works everywhere? Even on poles?
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2021 Jul 20, 13:18 -0700

    David Iwancio you wrote:  you can't determine the hour angle of a body from latitude 90° because you don't have an hour angle.

    Are you quite sure about that?  The celestial body has a sub-stellar point somewhere other than the Pole.  It has a declination and a Greenwich hour angle (GHA Aries + SHA) or a right-ascension, whichever you prefer.  True, LHA becomes a bit meaningless, but you don’t need LHA to plot a position line from an assumed position at the Pole.  You just need to know which meridian the body is on at the time of the observation, and all the meridians are shown on a polar projection.  It falls into the same bag of tricks as meridian passage and polaris observations.  DaveP

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site