Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: An analytical solution of the two star sight problem of celestial navigation
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2019 Mar 9, 08:15 -0800

    Further, we must not ignore the very item which permits the LoP to be approximated with a line.  That is the azimuth to the body.   That further restricts the length to a segment of the circumference.


    Your reminder prompts an interesting observation, which I’d never considered before. If you’re not where you think you are, how accurate is a celestial heading check?  In other words, if you’re using celestial to keep an inertial platform or similar aligned, what’s the chance of an unbounded runaway of position?  E.g. error in position leads to error predicted azimuth leading to error in heading leading to bigger error in position leading to bigger error in predicted azimuth and heading found and so on and so forth. DaveP

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site