NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Altitudes, close to 90
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Dec 1, 22:50 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Dec 1, 22:50 EST
Bill wrote:
"It seems to me that once seen it is simple, but putting the technique
into
words is challenging."
words is challenging."
I agree. I think of navigation manuals as early examples of
"technical writing". In the most common modern manifestation of this
art, I think we've all been subjected to truly awful computer manuals and,
with any luck, to some really good ones --it all depends on the
author.
I think you've hit the nail on the head, too, by pointing out that it's
easier to do once you've seen it, so maybe the trick is to describe how it
looks...
Let's suppose I am measuring the altitude of the Sun, and it's near 45
degrees. I set my sextant to 45 degrees, and aim it at the horizon holding it
more or less vertically. Now suppose I slowly rotate the sextant keeping the Sun
in the field of view until the handle of the sextant is
horizontal. Through the horizon glass, I can now see a spot in the sky to the
side of the Sun that is just about 45 degrees away from the Sun. I could keep on
rotating (keeping the Sun in view and leaving the index arm at 45) until the
sextant is completely upside down (sounds painful!). I should find that I am
looking straight up at the zenith through the hoizon glass. And I should
see the Sun's reflected image straight up, too. I can keep on rotating and
bring the Sun back down to the horizon on the opposite side. If we try it, it's
not hard to see that the instrument has gone through a complete rotation around
the axis that points to the Sun's apparent place in the sky. The Sun's reflected
image in the sextant has been carried around the sky in a big circle
with a radius of 45 degrees. For proper altitude measurement, we need to use the
same motion to examine a small portion of this same big circle. When you swing
the sextant to get the right altitude, the idea is to move the Sun's image
through that small portion of this large circle that just grazes the horizon,
sweeping first left and then right. By adjusting the micrometer until the Sun's
image touches the horizon only for an instant as it is swept past, we guarantee
that we are measuring the proper vertical altitude of the Sun.
By the way, the "wrong" method where the sextant is rocked about the line
of sight does work to an extent in some cases. But it's not general, and the
"correct" method is as easy and it's general so I can't see any reason not to
use it.
And:
"I am assuming the axis of rotation (along the line of sight to the
body)
would pass through the index mirror. Is that correct?"
would pass through the index mirror. Is that correct?"
It could do that, but I think for most people it would pass through a
spot behind the telescope or even through the observer's head. The axis of
rotation points to the the observed body, but the axis may lie some inches
outside the frame of the instrument. This works because the objects we're
observing are so far away.
Frank R
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois