NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Almanacs, theory and use.
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Nov 21, 08:57 -0500
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Nov 21, 08:57 -0500
the assumed position has to be fairly close to your actual position to work. If your longitude is out 180 degrees, it might even be off 180 degrees (there are two intersections of the circles of position on the globe). Even if you chose the right point of intersection, you have to be fairly close, a few degrees. What you can do then is take the newfound position as a second assumed position and rework the calculation. On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Isonomia wrote: > > Thanks again for all the links. > > I've worked out how it is possible to use a simple table to calculate > azimuth. > > My confusion came about because I read that the "assumed position" was > an arbitrary position, however given that a 3 significant digit cosine > take one page in a log table, then for an arbitrary two angle sum, one > is talking about hundreds of pages for a 4 significant figure double > angle table. > > From what I understand so far, the assumed position isn't arbitrary, > but is a whole number of degrees away from the geographic position, > making the tables much much smaller (by some 3600x) > > To be in simply, I was misled into believing the assumed position was > something to do with the desired outcome, rather than a simplification > of the calculation! > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---