NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Almanac data in 1855 (British vs American)
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 May 16, 23:25 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 May 16, 23:25 EDT
Gordon you wrote: "Without doing any real research on the exact date of changes in the American Nautical Almanac, and I will take that 1855 was a pivotal year, I do know that American Nautical Publications relied heavily on British Admiralty Publications." Before 1855, Americans navigated using the British Nautical Almanac as well as near-exact reprints published in the US by Blunt, Patten, and others (the British did not object to this sort of thing for their almanac data). Starting with the volume for 1855, we get the first true American almanac. It was the "American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac" (AmE&NA) and it was produced independently. It did not rely on the British almanac (except, no doubt, as a sanity check). A few years later, in 1858 apparently, the first section of the AmE&NA was published as a small paperback volume. This was called the "American Nautical Almanac" (AmNA). It was nothing more than a reprint of that first section of the AmE&NA until 1916. And: "We did not come really into our own until after the American Civil War" It was twenty years earlier for astronomy. And: "Simon Newcomb was, if I remember right, the main man that really advanced the Nautical Almanac Office. A top notch astronomer." You can read Simon Newcomb's own account of the early years of the American almanac online. Here: http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext03/slstr10.txt. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars