# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

**Advancing LOPs for precision fixes**

**From:**Gary LaPook

**Date:**2010 Feb 16, 01:28 -0800

On
my recent Atlantic crossing I wanted to take sights and produce fixes
that were as accurate as possible in order to gather data on celnav
accuracy. It is common practice to ignore the movement of the ship
during the time period needed to take a round of sights but since the
ship was sailing at ten to twelve knots I decided that I would take
this movement into account and advance the lines even for short
periods. At twelve knots the ship moves one nautical mile every five
minutes, one-tenth of a mile every thirty seconds. After using the
marine practice and doing this graphically a few times I decided to
switch to flight navigation practice and account for the movement of
the ship by mathematically adjusting the LOP. I wrote about this before
in discussing flight navigation so go to the following links to those
prior postings for a complete discussion of how this is done. But since
the Motion Of Observer (MOO) tables in H.O. 249 are for much higher
ground speeds I had to create my own such tables for use on the ship.
Attached are three photos of the table I created. The top of the table
is for a speed of ten knots. Across the top is minutes that the LOP
should be advanced. I had planned to compute values for each half knot
but decided that such precision was not necessary so I only did the
computation for whole knots, 10, 11 and 12.

I first computed the data for ten knots. The first two columns list the relative azimuth (ZN-TR) of the LOP to be advanced. I selected an interval of 20 degrees, 0, 20, 60, 80 and 90 for bodies ahead of the vessel with a plus sign (+) and 100, 120, 140, 160 and 180 for bodies behind the vessel with a minus sign (-) for applying the adjustment to sextant altitude. The values for 90 degrees are always zero so I omitted this for the other speeds. I also decided that the values I calculated for ten knots to one-hundredths of a minute of arc was gilding the Lilly so only listed them to one-tenth of a minute for the other speeds. The computation is easy. For 0 and 180 relative azimuths the adjustment is simply the distance covered by the ship during the period of time. For other relative azimuths you simply multiply the full value by the cosine of the relative azimuth.

Note the signs of the adjustments are for applying the adjustment to

Give it a try and you will see that it is easier to advance LOPs this way and it is as accurate as the more traditional method.

http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=105937&y=200807

http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=105938&y=200807

http://fer3.com/arc/img/105924.ho%20249%20extracts%20.pdf

gl

I first computed the data for ten knots. The first two columns list the relative azimuth (ZN-TR) of the LOP to be advanced. I selected an interval of 20 degrees, 0, 20, 60, 80 and 90 for bodies ahead of the vessel with a plus sign (+) and 100, 120, 140, 160 and 180 for bodies behind the vessel with a minus sign (-) for applying the adjustment to sextant altitude. The values for 90 degrees are always zero so I omitted this for the other speeds. I also decided that the values I calculated for ten knots to one-hundredths of a minute of arc was gilding the Lilly so only listed them to one-tenth of a minute for the other speeds. The computation is easy. For 0 and 180 relative azimuths the adjustment is simply the distance covered by the ship during the period of time. For other relative azimuths you simply multiply the full value by the cosine of the relative azimuth.

Note the signs of the adjustments are for applying the adjustment to

__sextant altitude__. This is opposite to my prior posts where the signs of those adjustments were for applying them to__computed altitude__which is the normal procedure in flight navigation. Making the adjustment to sextant altitude works well for marine practice in which the timing of the sight is random and is not preplanned and you only need to add one more line to your sextant correction form.Give it a try and you will see that it is easier to advance LOPs this way and it is as accurate as the more traditional method.

http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=105937&y=200807

http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=105938&y=200807

http://fer3.com/arc/img/105924.ho%20249%20extracts%20.pdf

gl