Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Adding beta Capricorni to the web-based lunars calculator?
    From: Peter Monta
    Date: 2013 Jul 28, 08:38 -0700

    > Of course. Please do. A positive bias like that suggests a simple error in
    > index correction. How do you normally test index error? I don't recall
    > --what type of sextant do you use?
    
    I'm using an Astra IIIB, purchased about ten years ago from
    Celestaire, along with a porro-prism monocular from them, which is
    marked "Cassens & Plath 6x30".  I recently discovered that it was out
    of collimation by about 2 degrees relative to the sextant plane with
    no visible damage or problems with the fork or attachment points, so
    I've shimmed it pending a more permanent repair.  I'm kind of evolving
    on index error measurement; there are many good suggestions in the
    archives.  Unfortunately it's not a constant 0.5' bias; from session
    to session it moves around from close to zero to close to 1', but
    fairly tight within the session.  My current thoughts are:
    
    - I don't like IE measurement with the horizon or single stars.  With
    the horizon (a treeline about 10 km away, so sextant parallax is a
    negligible 0.02 arcmin), contrast is poor because of the superimposed
    images, and I'm concerned about possible bias when approaching
    coincidence always with increasing angle, as recommended to avoid
    backlash.  As for single stars, it's even worse:  the horns of the
    dilemma are, on the one hand, with no side error the superimposed
    images are aberrated mush even with good focus, and with some side
    error, judging when the stars are closest is difficult with no wire or
    reticle telling me when the images are in a line normal to the sextant
    plane.
    
    - IE measurement with the solar or lunar disk is better, but this
    still gives information only near zero degrees on the arc, and I'm
    starting to worry about arc errors and micrometer-worm-eccentricity
    errors.
    
    - So, recently I've been measuring IE with star-star sights, three or
    four spread across the arc from 10 degrees to maybe 90 degrees.  For
    me, the swinging motion of the star in the index-mirror path really
    helps.  Just having some motion when the stars collide makes it seem
    like I have higher precision---the relative paths are trackable by
    eye.  I suppose I'd want the distances uniformly spread modulo 1
    degree to try to average out worm eccentricity, but I haven't done the
    planning for that yet.
    
    > It's good you're using a 6x30 scope.
    
    I'm coming to the conclusion that I really need a reticle.  I think
    some of my remaining error is still collimation, because with a
    6-degree FOV in the scope, it's hard to touch exactly in the center
    without a guide.  Chauvenet mentions 7 arcmin as a maximum angle
    between touch and collimation axis!  That's only 2% of my FOV.  Even
    if I loosen that to 15 arcmin, it's still challenging with no wires.
    
    > With that magnification, there's every reason to expect you'll be able to get
    > your mean error down to about a third of a minute of arc on individual
    > lunars, with no bias.
    
    I'd be happy with that.  I'll try to post my plots later today; random
    errors seem to be about that large, but all that's showing is my
    tangency repeatability.  The systematics are the hard part.  Of
    course, at some point one has to just stop, given the diminishing
    returns, or else get a better instrument (repeating circle perhaps).
    
    Cheers,
    Peter
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site