Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Accurate Parallax Computation
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2011 Feb 16, 15:35 -0800

    ACCURATE PARALLAX COMPUTATION


    Hello to all,


    With 2 good NavList Friends, we recently stumbled upon a somewhat "imprecise" definition from Jean Meeus in his very well known "ASTRONOMICAL ALGORITMS" book. Certainly it is not a "false" presentation, but certainly too this one does not quite belong either to the class of his most celebrated "crystal clear" definitions.

    It all deals with the way to accurately compute the Moon Parallax in a 2 dimension plan. When one needs to accurately compute Topocentric Height from Geocentric height, generally such computation is performed through iterations, since from Topocentric into Geocentric it is quite quite "straight and forward".

    While I first presented them with one such "direct" 2 dimension method, namely with Rectangular-Polar/Polar-Rectangular coordinates transformation, one of these Friends also pointed out that it is possible to use our more familiar Tangent/Arctangent functions to fulfill this aim.

    You will find in the enclosed "2 Dimension Parallax Computation.pdf" Annex one detailed way to perform such Tangent/Arctangent computation which does not require successive iterations.

    As explained in the bottom of this document :

    - If you know H topocentric, in order to compute SD topocentric (i.e. augmented SD) the recommended step is to "travel" through the Geocentric height to get back to Topocentric height and (this time at last) Distance from Body, which - only then - enables to accurately compute Augmented Semi-Diameter without special precaution, and
    - If utmost accuracy is required, e.g. for satellites work such GPS, and given that the Earth Center is most generally not on the downwards extension of the Observer's Zenith (i.e. not on the Observer's "Nadir"), then it is necessary to compute in 3 dimension space.

    As a conclusion, nothing really amazingly new here, and the idea to perform this computation this way is not even mine, but it is the one of a good and nice Friend. Nonetheless and as far as I am concerned, until now I have not found any detailed explanations anywhere (including in the outstanding "ASTRONOMIE GENERALE" by André Danjon) on the way to accurately treat parallax in Horizontal Coordinates.

    Hope it may help some fellow NavList Members, just in case …

    Best Regards to all,


    Kermit

    Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    File:

      
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site